Laserfiche WebLink
JAN-19-1999 TUE 10;30 AM ~CEL MAURO PC FAX N0. • ~ P. 03!05 <br />' Page t0 ~I <br />.~ <br />regulations, The Commission has scheduled a rulemakinp hearin0 titer the year fo r revisions to <br />~., the dsetwpe permit regulations, 6.1.0 (5 CCR 1002-2) to address deseharges to group wa4r. Atth's <br />lime there are no esnIIol regulations governing ground weber impaeh, and no speeafie ulatiorrs of this <br />type have been sedseduled for consideration bythe Commisson. Nowevar, the Com ~ ~ n believes that <br />>t is advsaWe to.have the poled oaf compliance process in place, so tlsat R should not be to <br />1et~ere the regulation when new control regulations are adopted or• the permit rtgulatior~, are revised. <br />The Commasion intends that detertncsations of a paint e>i complnnce wltltin tiassified ar•~, as well as for <br />statewide standards. by the Divsion w01 be appeahbk. The eoart process for web epp~als would be set <br />forth in amendments to the pertnd regulations or any new central regulation. <br />~- WHERE T1iE STANDARD IS APPLIED <br />Alter standards, the mast importarrt issue regarding Around water protections the I point at which <br />the starbard should be applied. At what Acid in the aquifer does ooraamination <br />noneompianex9 Among Ure poutl5 considered were the site boundary, the tirrut of ~ eorAamination, <br />or some speeded ttistane:e from the wntamination source. <br />Q eves detetmirsed that the eta boundary should set the outer unit for a pout of eompGan (eoxept for <br />surface water dsrharpes, as eliseussed below) because it dsmsguished areas that a rrsrble party <br />controls from areas where the general public maybe alfeesed. For the inner limit we ch the edge t1f <br />the activity ar eorrhmination source boundary to nrninae the area aflee:tad. These Gnsih consrstent <br />witlr previous Commistion rulRgs on me statewide standards <br />For e»tirp activities esntamination may have. to some etrberd, merged with the immediate tsearourre5ngs, <br />nnldrrp the ooetlarnirration source boundary ddfkirlt and espesssave to define. Wham the ndard6 might <br />be a:Deeded Dory in the immediate vicinity of a source, the east of romediation to avoid the eseeadencB <br />miptR be unjustified in relation m the benefih of remedratiorc Therefore, feu eoistirg aetiviY the <br />. reDldatwn allows tiro Division to establish the point of oomplhnee at a speedfied dmtanoe the <br />ebrrbmination source, faldesg ieto account sits~spseirie fae3s es aexnidance witis exiteria s ed out in the <br />regulation. Applsation of the standards at the apedfie ae~v~ly boundary might not serve th intendrd <br />purpose of avoiding largo e~endrurres for very ittie gait, and yet setting seine large a dunce <br />would be inwtfieiently proteesve_ For those hoi~BS who have emndueied prior inves3gatia b eliseover <br />and map the eneert of emtinp eonmmination, the option clefs to set the point of tmmpGan at the <br />kadasp edge of the plume. <br />For ru.vr ae:tiviti~, new DppoeWs>Ees for site salerban and preparation become available. F r new sites <br />we propose 1o apply the standards at the specitie ae3r3y boundary. N effceX fhis's as as <br />appyirp them atthe spe~afic mntaminadon source (e.g., the point atthe bottom of an lingo ndment at <br />which a leak oexurs), wh0e a0owirp;ome benefd from stxption and dYution in immedrafely jaerent <br />Around, n rase small leaks Demur. <br />~IQW THE STANDARD IS APPLIF~ <br />The t:omnirasion reemgn¢ed the dil6earlly of eAmplyiig wits a eonoartbation unit standard a feed point <br />r space, when operating wilts the temporal and spatial variatiors urherent in groDrd vrater~low. <br />The iderrt er< erry permit or control regulation should be to pemnt sampling frequeetry and ' elation <br />that adequately rofiecis groundwater quality ruhtion aver time. Owners and operators rho Id have <br />latlhrde n rtes regard provided that an aexeplabk msinum number of samples are takers m each well <br />annually. At the d'senetitm of the owner/operator a shorter sampfery interval maybe empl to <br />ttamorrsir~ that an exeeedenee of standards ~ due too temperel eRet~ This interval shou be <br />demrmirad aRer avaleotirg the aquifers efisetivs peroaiy, hydreuic eonduedivity, and hydra Ge grddisnt <br />(which would govern rates of Aow), and use fate and transport e3rareedertsti s of the poterstial <br />r~~_ <br />_j ._. <br />CCR 1t]02.41 <br />THE CODE OF COLORADO REGULATIONS <br />G <br />• <br />