Laserfiche WebLink
22. Defendant has conducted underground mining operations <br />under the Solitar.i.o tract of land and under the "Erickson <br />house". Subsi•9e:~ce and explosions have resulted due to this <br />mining operation.. The "Erickson house" has suffered <br />structural dar.~age including but not limited to cracks and <br />other evidence ~f subsidence and underground movement and <br />tremors. <br />23. Defendants clid not abide by the letter agreement of May <br />19, 1988. Defendants failed and refused to protect <br />Plaintiffs home from subsidence damage. <br />24. Plaintiffs have expended several thousands of dollars <br />attempting to repair the damage to Plaintiffs home caused by <br />the underground mining by Defendants on Plaintiff's <br />property. Plaintiffs property has decreased in value to the <br />actions of Defendants. The cost to repair Plaintiffs home <br />could be as r~~uch as ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS <br />($100,000.00). The cost to replace Plaintiffs home is <br />estimated to be THREE to FOUR HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS <br />($300,000.00 to X400,000.00) Defendant has conducted <br />underground mining under Plaintiffs property in a manner <br />such that the buildings and structures owned by Plaintiffs <br />are damaged. Such. buildings and structures were built prior <br />to Defendant's oy~~rations. The operations by Defendant were <br />negligent and wi~hout adequate safeguards to prevent damage <br />to Plaintiffs property. Plaintiffs sue for the above <br />damages. <br />25. Plaintiffs Solitario property has suffered a loss in <br />value of SIXTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($65,000.00) due to the <br />acts of the Defendant in addition to the actual physical <br />damage. <br />COUNT III <br />26. Tatums incorporate by reference herein the allegations <br />set forth in paragraphs 1 through 25 above. <br />27. Plaintiffs _wn a tract of land on the_South--Fork ~f the <br />Purgatorie River known as the Torres Tract. This land is <br />primarily used to raise irrigated hay and to graze <br />Plaintiffs' stock. In 1990 Defendant Wyoming Fuel came to <br />Plaintiffs and advised Plaintiffs that Defendant needed to <br />utilize some cf ?l.aintiffs surface acreage to drill a large <br />airshaft, consi:ruct a road, build a power plant and blower <br />facility to conduct operations, under Plaintiffs property. <br />The purpose of !his installation was to remove explosive <br />gases from the mine and expel it into the atmosphere close <br />to Plaintiffs' house and stock. Plaintiffs agreed to allow <br />the use and taking of his land for this purpose in exchange <br />for 2 c.f.s. cf water from the water rights of Defendant out <br />of the Consolidated Ditch located at the Torres tract. This <br />was agreed to and the Defendant entered onto Plaintiff's <br />, <br />