Laserfiche WebLink
kc~ H~ : u. a as. i,~-au- .. :~: •,.rP~t ;,na s:~ l ~:3ea- u. e. xs.: a 2 <br />i <br />Y <br />t+ . <br />,~ <br />-. <br />. <br />M ..- v tbrEi 70 <br />United States Department of the <br />OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS <br />Interior Bond of Lind Appwls <br />4015 \Y,Isoa Boulevvd <br />tvlinnaton. vu~inia 22za3 <br />JllL 2 6 ~ <br />p ~ (~I~II~~ ~~~ <br />Interi~r. J <br />JUL 2 B 20x0 <br />CffICE CFTFEIIf;IDNltLSOLICI!t?H <br />n~lw, l COLORA00 <br />cc~r~F~ Ea <br />D3IA 96-908 No. CC-93-020-008 <br />96-918 <br />151 IBIA 286 <br />Jlr! 6 ADN TAT(Id Surface Mira.tLq Cftizen's <br />(IN RECCTSTIYOZA~ZCN) Ccaplaint <br />Petition for Reoamidaration <br />Denied <br />Ca January 5, 2000, this Board issued a decision styled Jim ~ Atui <br />Tatum, 151 IffiA 226, in which we addressed separate appeals (TBTA 96-90 and <br />~ r~91} filed by the Tatuos fxffi two decisions of the Regional AireCtor, <br />Western Regional Cm„ii,,,,tiLy- ~~, Office Of Surface Mining Reclamatim <br />atnd ltlforcetaen*_ (~U , dated Auq~t 24, 1995, and September 18, 1995, <br />affinninq det•,ar+~+;,,ations of the Delver and Ai?b~,p"g'=°- Oed Field Cfliees <br />°tbat the zesponses of the State of Colorado, Department of Natural <br />Plseurces, Division of M;ni ~ and Geology (III}r ~'e appropriate actSon in <br />rsSponse to Tea:-Dey Notice ('ITNI No. 93-020-370-005 issued by CEri. tai <br />issued the TIN to LMi follaainq receipt of a citizen's o~].aint <br />Rao. LC-93-020-008) frcm the Tattms alleging that an iu~detgrolad mining <br />operation ~,r-re,a by Basin Reaotatroes, Inc. (ERI) lformerly, Wyoming Fuel. <br />CatP'izly}, had caused subsidezrx damage to their haae near Weston, Colorado, <br />and damaged a livestock water well aL their property. <br />OEid seeks ~T*~G;dertion ally of that part of our decision relating <br />to IffiA 96-91, which addresses that portion of TIId Noi 93-020-370-005 <br />rrnroyT,; n~ alleged Sl]b5idenOe•~related vlolatlcav by BRI. $ that Fart of <br />our decision, we vacated the Regional DireCCOr's decision and the <br />tuderlying decision of the air~,g,erque Field Office and rema>•ded the case <br />to Cad for appropriate action. CSM also seeks a stay of our decision <br />pendi*lq a decision on its petition. <br />In a formal citizen a~p].ai.nt dated Ivovaober 3C, 1993, the Tatums made <br />various allegations, including "Rule [2 Colo. Cade Regs.] 4.20 'cti,t,~,~ta.,. <br />Cattml' providing for protection of the surface owners praQerty and water <br />welt appeals to have been deliberately ignored. No mrnitoring of the <br />