My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE35520
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE35520
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:45:06 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 2:39:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981039
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
5/6/1991
Doc Name
Ccomments on TDN 91-2-116-4 TV3
From
PARCEL MAURO HULTIN & SPAANSTRA PC
To
MLRD
Violation No.
CV1991002
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Steve Renner <br />May 6, 1991 <br />Page 5 <br />Phase I and Phase II bond release for the entire site, except for <br />Phase II bond release on those portions of Pit 4 revegetated in <br />1990. Rockcastle has submitted extensive information supporting <br />both Phase I and II bond release for the site. Thus, Rockcastle is <br />entitled to a return of 85 percent of its $446,680 bond ($379,678). <br />This amount substantially exceeds the amount which has been <br />released to date by CMLRD ($312,376). <br />I Similarly, issues regarding hydrologic monitoring and sediment <br />pond inspections are also substantively moot. Rockcastle continues <br />to monitor surface water discharges at the site. Further, <br />Rockcastle has prepared and submitted extensive information <br />regarding the condition and stability of the sediment ponds in <br />preparation for removing these ponds. <br />OSM raises several issues regarding backfilling Pit 5/6. OSM <br />misinterprets the Agreement to require additional backfilling and <br />grading at Pits 5/6. Pursuant to the Agreement, Rockcastle could <br />demonstrate that these Pits are geotechnically and geomorphically <br />stable. Agreement $ IV.1. Rockcastle has demonstrated to CMLRD's <br />satisfaction that the pits are geotechnically stable, and has <br />proposed measures, after consultation with CMLRD, to enhance the <br />geomorphic stability of the pits. Moreover, the Agreement <br />recognizes that these pits were reclaimed many years ago, that <br />substantial revegetation is present at the site, and that <br />redisturbance of the pits would result in undesirable, unnecessary <br />and unreasonable environmental harm. Moreover, all required <br />backfilling and grading at the Grassy Gap mine has been completed, <br />and therefore Phase I bond release is appropriate. <br />We hope the foregoing comments are helpful in responding to <br />OSM. Please do not hesitate to contact me or Brent Anderson if you <br />have any questions regarding the content of this letter or if we <br />can be of further assistance in this matter. Thank you. <br />Sincerely, <br />L, MAURO, ~iLTL2'IN AND SPAANSTRA, P. C. <br />II ~ ~/ ~I <br />R. assev~~~'~-- <br />B'rent'C. Anderson . <br />ATTORNEYS FOR THE ROCXCASTLE COMPANY <br />BCA:pjh <br />Enclosure <br />cc: David J. MacDougall, Esq. <br />Mark Rorb, Esq. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.