My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE35519
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE35519
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:45:06 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 2:39:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981015
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
5/5/1994
Doc Name
FRUITA MINE TEN DAY NOTICE 91-02-116-05
From
DMG
To
OSM
Violation No.
TD1991020116005TV3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. .i <br />STATE OF COLOIZP~DO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Depanmenl of Natural Resources <br />111 7 Sherman 51 , Room '.I S <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phune.(3071866-3567 <br />FAX~1307183LR106 <br />May 5, 1994 <br />Mr Thomas Ehmett <br />Acting Director <br />Office of Surface Mining <br />Albuquerque Field Office <br />505 Marquette Avenue NW <br />Suite 1200 <br />Albuquerque New Mexico 87102 <br />RE: Fruita Mine Ten-Day Notice 91-02-116-05 <br />Dear Mr. Ehmett: <br />~~~~~~ <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCE <br />Rul Ruiner <br />Goccrnnr <br />Kan S,rla nu <br />Evv ui u• Unn mi <br />nr~r h.re~U Ir,n~ <br />om.u.n Duri iw <br />On April 28, 1994 the Division of Minerals and Geology (Division) <br />received a finding of an inappropriate response regarding the <br />above referenced Ten-Day notice from the Albuquerque Field Office <br />(AFO). In accordance with 30 CFR 842.11(b)(1)(A) Colorado <br />requests an informal review of this determination by the Deputy <br />Director. <br />Colorado disagrees with the AFO determination that the Fruita <br />Mine does not qualify for the exemption applicable to <br />continuously mined areas at underground operations. It is well <br />documented that there has been on-going reclamation and <br />permitting activities at this site into the 1990's. The AFO <br />interpretation of the Colorado Rules essentially defines <br />reclamation activities at a mine site as an activity other than <br />surface mining. Specifically, the AFO quotes from the preamble <br />to the final rule approving the amendment: "unless an underground <br />OPERATION began prior to August 3, 1977, and continued OPERATIONS <br />into permanent program approval..." (emphasis added). <br />Apparently, the AFO believes that the word "operations" is <br />synonymous with extraction, and does not contemplate reclamation <br />activities. However, the Colorado Rules for Coal Mining define <br />Surface Coal Mining Operations as "Activities conducted on the <br />surface of lands in connection with a surface coal mine or <br />activities subject to the requirements of Section 34-33-121 of <br />the Act...". The Act at Section 121 defines reclamation <br />requirements at underground mines in Colorado. Therefore, <br />Colorado interprets its Rules to mean that reclamation operations <br />are considered to be surface coal mining operations, and are <br />subject to regulation under the Act. As such, a mine such as the <br />Fruita Mine, which began operations prior to August 3, 1977 and <br />concluded reclamation after permanent program approval, is <br />eligible for the exemption for complete elimination as provided <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.