My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-01-29_REVISION - M1992066
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1992066
>
2003-01-29_REVISION - M1992066
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:13:57 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 2:39:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1992066
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/29/2003
Doc Name
Adequacy Response
From
Duckels Construction
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Floodplain Delineation Report Pa e 3 of 4 <br />Hogue Pit g <br />RESULTS <br />Complete results are included in the attached Figures f-6. Results show that the ftoodway <br />along this reach is fully contained within the riparian corridor of the Yampa River. Based on <br />the width of the river (150-175 feet) and the slope (nearly one percent), this is a reasonable <br />result. The floodplain is essentially contained within the channel until cross-section 3 (XS-3), <br />where it spreads out into the adjacent pasture land on the right overbank area. The base <br />flood elevation varies by cross-section. All elevations are indicated as Mean Sea Level, <br />1929 NVGD, elevations. <br />Shallow overbank floodwaters can backflow into the mining operation at the southwest <br />comer of the existing mine. When full, the elevation of water in the pit will equal the base <br />flood elevation at the southwest comer, equal to the base flood elevation of 6567.5 at cross- <br />section 2 (XS-2). Based on the existing site conditions, all areas upstream of cross-section 3 <br />(XS-3), are above the 1 DO-year floodplain. <br />The limits of the flcdway and floodplain are shown on Figure 2. The remainder of Figures <br />3-6 show the resul~f the HEC-RAS analysis for existing conditions. <br />SUMMARY <br />The results of thoodway and floodplain study indicate that the gravel mining operation is <br />subject to floodi om shallow overbank flow backflowing into the southwest comer of the <br />pit. Per discs' May 17, 2002 with John Eastman, Routt County Planning Department, <br />ranter than bed southwest comer of the pit, an option is to allow the pit to Flood in an <br />e~~me event' rs feasible, as the equipment in the pit is mobile, and can be moved in <br />the event of ~srer levels. A second option would be b construct a small berm (one to <br />three feet ~i9hvever, not constructing a berm will alleviate any potential concerns with <br />modificatio *1 of~odplain within this reach of the Yampa River. <br />Rev 1 - 17 _Ma} <br />I W~RESOURGE CONSULT.WTS, LL-c <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.