Laserfiche WebLink
III. <br />DMG's position does not violate § 34-33-108, C.R.S. <br />For the reasons stated in the Division's Response to Powderhom's Petition <br />regarding the December NOV, Powderhorn's argument fails. The Division will not <br />reiterate its arguments but simply incorporates its previous arguments. <br />IV. <br />Thirty days is a reasonable time to abate the NOV. <br />Powderhorn argues that the abatement period of 30 days for the April NOV is <br />not reasonable and should be extended to May 3l, 2001, which is about 15 days <br />longer than the present due date of May 14. Powderhorn's argument rings hollow. <br />Powderhorn has known about the decertification of Frontier and its failing <br />health since last June. The Division's initial NOV was issued in December, almost <br />five months ago. The abatement period for that NOV was extended by more than 120 <br />days. Powderhorn has yet to comply with that NOV by replacing the Frontier bond. <br />To the best of counsels' knowledge, Powderhorn has not taken one step in the <br />bankruptcy court to obtain a replacement bond, and Powderhorn has given no <br />indication that it will take any step to obtain a replacement bond. In the meantime, <br />Frontier continues to decline and appears to be heading for forced liquidation. <br />Moreover, Powderhom has not come close to completing reclamation of this <br />site, and contrary to Powderhorn's argument, there exist conditions at the site which <br />13 <br />