My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE35443
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE35443
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:45:00 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 2:37:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981015
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
9/26/1991
Doc Name
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
Violation No.
CV1991005
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.:- _ ~.., <br />Justification of Settlement Agreement <br />for NOV C-g1-005 <br />Conference Summary <br />NOV C-91-005 was issued for "failure to conduct mulching and seeding <br />operations of topsoiled areas during the first normal period for favorable <br />planting" as required in Rule 4.15.3(1). <br />The NOV was discussed briefly, in general term <br />representing American Shield indicatetl that he <br />either the facts of the violation as described <br />report or the amount of proposed civil penalty <br />Division offered no further information on the <br />the components upon which the proposed penalty <br />The proposed civil penalty was: <br />History 350. 00 <br />Seriousness 3250. 00 <br />Fault 3500. 00 <br />Good Faith 3 0. 00 <br />rotas 3aoo.oo <br />s, at which point Greg Lewicki, <br />had chosen not to contest <br />in the NOV and inspection <br />David Berry, representing the <br />specifics of the violation or <br />assessment was issued. <br />Since the originally proposed penalty was contested by neither party, the <br />$800.00 amount is proposed in the Settlement Agreement. <br />8126E <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.