Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-z- <br />Most of the disturbed area drainage passes t <br />structures approved under an old permit. Ho <br />area had been topsoiled or seeded which grey <br />sediment. The runoff from those areas not c <br />went into adjacent undisturbed areas causim <br />those areas was not contained within the di <br />3 is located within a few hundred feet of M <br />a potential alluvial valley floor. If left <br />damage could be much greater. <br />Seriousness <br />Fault - 5.04.5(2)(c) <br />This violation occurred because of neglige <br />sediment control system had been noted as .: <br />reports since May, 1983. The September 15, <br />the June, 1983 inspection report. Addition <br />operator on July 7, 1983 expressing concern <br />approved sediment control system at Energy <br />encouraged to submit a plan as soon as possi <br />inspection, the problem was discussed with t <br />ugh sediment control <br />er, none of the disturbed <br />increases the amount of <br />rolled by the old system <br />osion. Sediment from <br />bed area. Energy Mine No. <br />.e Creek and is adjacent to <br />:ontrolied the extent of <br />tal $ 875.00 <br />Lack of an approved <br />roblem in the inspection <br />383 deadline was imposed in <br />iy, a letter was sent to the <br />gout the need for an <br />3 and the operator was <br />le. In each subsequent <br />.:e operator. <br />A plan was not submitted until September 9, 1983. The plan was <br />inadequate and the Division could not recommend approval. <br />Because of the operator's lack of diligence in pursuing this problem, the <br />maximum amount for negligience is proposed. <br />Negligence total $ 750.00 <br />Gnnd Faith <br />No reduction for good faith is proposed. The abatement deadline for <br />constructing the system is October 17, 1983. It will be examined during <br />the next inspection. Thus far, an adequate plan has not been submitted. <br />Proposed Civil Penalty <br />Total $1,625.00 <br />Doc. No. 6141 <br />