My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1993-06-01_ENFORCEMENT - C1980001 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Enforcement
>
Coal
>
C1980001
>
1993-06-01_ENFORCEMENT - C1980001 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2021 4:05:11 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 2:35:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
6/1/1993
Doc Name
Letter Signed Settlement Agreement Receipt
From
THE PITTSBURG & MIDWAY COAL MINING CO
To
CDMG
Violation No.
CV1993025
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT JUSTIFICATION <br /> NOV C-93-025 <br /> Assessment Conference Summary <br /> Nov C-93-025 was issued by Susan Morrison of the Division for <br /> " [F]ailure to include a description and detailed design for each <br /> existing structure, for which there are specific design criteria or <br /> performance standards, proposed to be used in connection with or to <br /> facilitate the surface coal mining and reclamation operations" . <br /> The NOV referenced various berms, ditches, and culverts within <br /> portions of the Edna Mine permit area for which specific designs or <br /> descriptions were required, but had not been submitted. <br /> For several of the structures, the Operator representatives <br /> conceded that oversights occurred and the required designs had not <br /> been provided. However, they indicated that designs for "Goat <br /> Trail" access road culverts had been provided. Subsequent review <br /> of Exhibit 3 . 5-1 (Sheet 2 of 2) and Table 3 . 5-3 has confirmed this <br /> and the NOV will need to be modified. The Operator also argued <br /> that the berm on the east side of the shop warehouse pad was an <br /> MSHA required safety berm not required for drainage or materials <br /> containment purposes, and the Division indicated that this would be <br /> researched and the NOV modified if appropriate. The Operator <br /> contended that the typical road ditch designs in the permit applied <br /> to the "Goat Trail" access road as well as haul roads, but conceded <br /> that this was not specified in the permit. <br /> Fact of Violation <br /> The Operator representatives conceded that required designs for <br /> certain structures had not been provided. I find that a violation <br /> did occur. <br /> Civil Penalty Assessment <br /> Proposed Penalty Assessment <br /> History $ 0.00 <br /> Seriousness 500. 00 <br /> Fault 250. 00 <br /> Good Faith 0. 00 <br /> Total $750. 00 <br /> History <br /> The History component was not disputed. <br /> Seriousness <br /> The cited deficiencies were apparently permitting oversights. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.