My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE35313
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE35313
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:44:55 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 2:34:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
6/11/1993
Doc Name
FORMAL PUBLIC HEARING MEMO
From
DMG
To
MLRB
Violation No.
CV1993006
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~J <br /> <br />ARCO :% <br />legal <br />555 Seventeenth Street <br />Cenver. CO 80202 <br />Telephone 303 293 1230 <br />Fjcsimile 303 293 X092 <br /> <br />Scot W. Andersen <br />Se~ror anorr:ey <br />RF~~I~i c% <br />APR 2 g 1993 <br />April 27, 1993 <br />Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board <br />State of Colorado <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Onrsror ,~ <br />~ AL'u8ru.: a .]ClIL'Y: <br />CERTIFIED MAIL <br />Return Receipt Requested <br />Re: Request for Formal Review of Notice of Violation C-93-006 <br />Dear Sir or Madam: <br />On February 19, 1993, the Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology (Division) issued <br />Notice of Violation (NOV) No. C-93-006 to Mountain Coal Company's West Elk Mine, <br />located near Somerset, Colorado. This NOV was the first issued to Mountain Coal <br />Company's West Elk Mine in nearly seven years. While acknowledging that Mountain <br />Coal Company performed subsidence monitoring surveys throughout the relevant <br />period, the Division alleges in the NOV that Mountain Coal Company failed to submit <br />subsidence monitoring reports to the Division between October of 1990 and January <br />of 1993. Mountain Coal Company disputes this allegation. <br />On March 16, 1993, the Division assessed a 5500 penalty for this NOV. On April 14, <br />1993, Mountain Coal Company participated in an assessment conference concerning <br />this NOV. As a result of that conference, the Division modified and terminated the <br />NOV because the Division found that Mountain Coal Company had abated the NOV <br />prior to its issuance. The Division also reduced the proposed penalty from 5500 to <br />S250. The Division did not, however, grant Mountain Coal Company's request that <br />the NOV be vacated. <br />Mountain Coal Company therefore requests that the Board formally review NOV C-93- <br />006. Mountain Coal Company believes that this NOV was improvidently issued and <br />rests on a misapprehension of both the facts underlying the NOV and the legal <br />standard for compliance with subsidence monitoring requirements. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.