My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE35313
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE35313
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:44:55 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 2:34:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
6/11/1993
Doc Name
FORMAL PUBLIC HEARING MEMO
From
DMG
To
MLRB
Violation No.
CV1993006
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />February 19, 1993 Page 2 <br />NOV C-93-006 <br />gTEP 2: A report format for the subsidenoe Monitoring Reports <br />Heads to bs designed for the six-month and year-and report, in <br />order to fulfill this abatement step. Referencing stipulation <br />17, "This report format should recognize the importance of <br />continual update oP subsidence data interpretation, monitoring <br />of ground water levels and spring flows, monitoring oP mina <br />inflow, and subaurfnae ground conditions which could ba <br />correlated to subsidence prediction.". (In earlier <br />correspondence between the Division and MCC, during the 1991 <br />(9a) Permit Renewal, the Division determined that this <br />stipulation could be terminated beeause it had been <br />incorporated into the permit application. IIpan further ravinw <br />by the Division, it was noted that this stipulation contained <br />two parts. The first part, which required MCC to submit <br />reports of its eubeidenc• monitoring program on a semi-annual <br />basis has bean complied with ns stated previously; however, <br />the second part requires submittal of a revised report Format, <br />which has not been oomplied with. 81nca, the second part has <br />not been complied with, the stipulation was not terminated.} <br />Corresponding with Stipulation 17, MCC should conaidar, at <br />least, providing the information required in STEP 3, below, as <br />part o! MCC~e year-end submittal. The mid-year submittal <br />could inoluda a portion of this information. <br />~: Aa mentioned previously, the Division did receive a <br />Subaidonae Monitoring Report on January 19, 1996. since it <br />hoe been ono-and-a-halt years since the Division hoe had the <br />opportunity to review MCC~s subsidence data, the following <br />information must be submitted in order to abate BTEP 3: <br />1. A summary o! surveying techniques and monitoring schedule. <br />Z. The elevation difference between the current survey and <br />the last survey. <br />3. A comparison of predictions versus actual data. <br />a. A topography map with the subsidence monuments far tho <br />F-aoam and B-seam olearly identified, as well as the bench <br />mark monuments !or each subsidence monitoring network. <br />5. Amine plan map which shows where mining hoe occurred <br />since the last survey and where mining will occur until <br />the next survey is completed. This map should ba the acme <br />scale as the map requested in }4 above, ao that the two <br />mops can be superimposed. <br />6. A summary of the subsidence results to date. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.