My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE35270
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE35270
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:44:53 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 2:33:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1983141
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
4/13/1992
Doc Name
PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION FROM NOV M-92-021 & CEASE & DESIST ORDER
Violation No.
MV1992021
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Succession approval was acknowledged by Mined Land Reclam- <br />ation Division on October 21, 1991, MLRB approved on March 18, <br />1991, which approval incorporated, as amended and supplemented, <br />all application materials as an integral part of permit as then amended. <br />Petitioner herein, in reliance upon actions in transference of the <br />~~ permit, read and understood the amended permit of July 20, 1985 as <br />~(vi5„~ substituting for Gold Hill Ventures Limited Partnership, the now co- <br />~~~"" ~~k `~ermittee Gold Hill Ventures and COM, Inc. <br />1N~ The effect, as understood by Petitioner, was to so redesignate <br />permittee (co-permittees) as applicant/operator, owner of affected <br />lands, owner of substance to be mined and milled. <br />In each instance, it remained understood in limitation, mill <br />would not accept or process third party or custom ore on a toll milling <br />or contract basis. As differently stated under the milling plan, sub- <br />paragraph 4 "the mill will not be operated as a custom milling facility <br />and it will not process ores on a toll basis for other mining <br />operations." <br />~0'1 ~ It was the understanding of Petitioner the mill was permitted to <br />~S~d" rocess ores owned by operator/co-permittee. It was on the basis of <br />-~~d h is understanding, co-permittee, COM, Inc., entered into its contract <br />U~'w with Energetics, through its Colorado-based associated company, to <br />acquire proprietary rights to the Bueno ores. <br />It should be additionally recognized, preliminary to resumption/ <br />commencement of mill operations, co-permittee concluded a <br />contractual agreement with Mi Vida Enterprises, Inc. (Steen family <br />corporation) to mill ores from Mi Vida (Gold Hill) properties on a <br />priority basis at such times as Mi Vida elected, at its sole option, to <br />deliver ores to the mill. <br />This agreement was calculated to resolve many of those <br />substantial differences between COM, Inc. (Erasers) and Mi Vida <br />(Steens) with respect to utilization of the mill in a productive manner <br />to conserve and sustain the considerable FYaser financial commitment. <br />This priority milling agreement is based upon and arises out of <br />the original draft document prepared and submitted to COM, Inc. <br />(FYaser) by John Henderson on behalf of Mi Vida (Steens). This draft <br />document served as the basis for the final negotiated agreement. <br />This priority milling agreement clearly contemplates the mill <br />will operate to mill ores from sources other than those owned or <br />controlled by Mi Vida at Gold Hill. This alternative milling is to occur <br />during those periods in which Mi Vida fails to deliver ores to the mill <br />from its sources in proximity to the mill. <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.