Laserfiche WebLink
<br />SUMMARY: - 4 - <br />DEFINITIONS: <br />"Affected Land" <br />In the February 25, 2003 letter from Rocky Mountain <br />Materials & Asphalt, Inc.it is cl;eacl'y~;Stated that: <br />"As an owner of property that adjoins <br />our property." <br />Therefore, our property is affected and it is very possible our land <br />will be disturbed as a result of Rocky Mountain's mining operation: <br />We feel the aesthetic beauty of our land will be destroyed by their <br />operation. <br />We believe the noise, heavy truck traffic and much dust will create <br />great havoc to our property. <br />"Aggrieved" <br />We were very upset and. stressed when we received notice that a <br />Life of the Mine permit was applied. for; and that the operation <br />would be adjoining our property. <br />Although no one lives on the property.now,.we would suffer a <br />a great loss as this type of operation would: <br />a. .UPSET i3ny plans the family may have in the future for <br />their property; <br />b. spoil. any enhancement of that area; <br />c. would ruin the aesthetic view from our property; <br />d. affect the value of properties in that area; <br />e. As a neighbor to .this .type of operation, we would receive <br />the brunt of the pollution and toxins; and <br />f. we just don't want that type of operation fora neighbor. <br />Again, we are very concerned about what impact this operation will have on our property; <br />and hope these concerns and objections are taken into consideration and that Rocky <br />Mountain is not granted'ae.peem:fltc•. <br />However, we realize the final decision rests. with the Board; AND, we would also like <br />to know, IF THE PERMIT IS GRANTED:• <br />Would we still have access to our property, or <br />Would they cut us off? <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />/ June A. .Mr-amo Ei <br />714 East Mesa Avenue <br />Pueblo, Colorado 81006 <br />