My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-05-14_REVISION - M1992016 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1992016
>
2003-05-14_REVISION - M1992016 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:33:29 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 2:30:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1992016
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/14/2003
Doc Name
Pre-hearing Conference Meeting held 05/07/
From
June A. Mramor
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
AM2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
+ V <br />TO WHOMiIT MAY CONCERN: <br />- 3 - <br />May 2, 2003 <br />Re: Rocky Mountain Materials & Asphalt,. Inc. <br />UEQ STIONS: <br />L. Has Rocky Mountain contacted the "Citizens for Clean Air & Water".notifying <br />them of their plans for this type of operation which would pollute the air <br />with dust? <br />2. Have they contacted the "Citizens for Clean Air & Water" notifying them of <br />the possibility of polluting the water? <br />3. Has Rocky Mountain contacted the Department of Health & Safety to report that <br />this operation would be free from any hazards and dangers to the residents of <br />.Canon City, Florence and Colorado Springs by their transporting this gravel. <br />This could create much heavy traffic going back and forth. <br />4. Have they checked into the matter as to what pollutions and/or toxins this <br />type of operation would release; and would they violate the Federal Clean <br />Air Act? <br />5. If the permit is granted and, after the land has been damaged by this type of <br />mining operation for a "Life of the Mine" period, has Rocky Mountain made <br />plans to re habilitate the land so that it can be useful after the mining <br />operation ceases - maybe 50 years or more later - or, will they just leave it <br />as it is and forget about it? <br />LAST.: I'm not .sure what you:°mean by "would That is the question I asked you. <br />we still have access to our property <br />or would they cut us off?" <br />The applicant does not show that the pro- We are aware that none of our land will be mined; <br />posed affected land area includes any of however, we are affected as the operation abuts <br />your property, so none will be mined or our property and we will be affected by the <br />affected. dust pollution, noise, heavy traffic, etc. <br />Whatever roads exist in the area will <br />remain after mining ceases. <br />It is possible that roads may be changed to <br />benefit the mining project if the permit is <br />granted; and, after mining ceases, as <br />previously stated, will Rocky Mountain re= <br />habilitate the .land so it will be in the same <br />condition it was before they started their <br />mining operation? <br />If you have any questions whatsoever, <br />please call me. <br />I did not think. it was necessary to call you; <br />instead, I have answered your statements as <br />they appeared in your letter. <br />R@spectfully submitted, <br />%June A. Mramor, ETAt~ r <br />714 East Mesa Avenue <br />Pueblo, Colorado 81006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.