My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-04-12_REVISION - M1983067 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1983067
>
2006-04-12_REVISION - M1983067 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/21/2025 2:14:49 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 2:27:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1983067
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
4/12/2006
Doc Name
Stability Analysis
From
Lafarge West Inc.
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
TR2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Ken Lambrecht <br />April 4, 2006 <br />Page 4 <br />Reclamation Hirhwall <br />We understand that if the gravel pit highwall is to be mined at a 3:1 the setback distance will be set at a <br />predetermined distance of 16 feet. Therefore in this second scenario we did not try to optimize this <br />distance. Instead we modeled the 16-foot setback distance and presented the factor of safety. As the <br />factor of safety is relatively high only the deepest bedrock section was modeled. <br />Table d below summarizes the results of our analysis. Typical required factors of safety for temporary <br />mine slopes and reservoir embankments are provided for comparison. Output graphics for each of the <br />analyses are attached. <br />Table 4: Hi hwall to Slur Wall Setback En 'neerin Anal sis Results <br /> Setback Catcutated Typical Required <br />Mode[ Distance (feet) F~Q or of Factor of Safety <br /> <br />Temporary Mine <br />O.S:1Highwall Shallow 10 1.33 1.2 <br />Section <br />Temporary Mine 0.5:1 <br />HighwallIntetmediate 30 1.26 1.2 <br />Section <br />Temporary Mine 0.5:1 <br />Highwall Deep Section 30 1.26 1.2 <br />with weathered bedrock <br />Long Term Compacted <br />Clay Slope Liner Full 20 1.81 1.5 <br />Reservoir <br />Long Term Compacted <br />Clay Slope Liner Rapid 20 1.21 1.2 <br />Drawdown <br />Long Tenn 3:1 Mined 16 21 <br />2 1 <br />5 <br />Slo e . . <br />Feathered bedrock is present, the mine highwall setback should be 30 feet from the slurry wa]] using <br />steep highwall alternative. Please see Figure 1 for a graphical representation of the steep highwall <br />mative setback distances. <br />highwall is mined at the final reclamation s]ope of 3:1, a 16-foot setback provides adequate <br />summary, a 16-foot setback from the slurry wall to a 3:1 mining slope provides an acceptable <br />lculated factor of safety. If a steeper highwall is desired, a 37-foot setback between the slurry wall <br />d the top of slope is required along the eastern side of the pit to meet DMG requirements. Along the <br />maining sides where no adjacent structures are within 200 feet, a setback distance from the slurry wall <br />the top of slope is 10 feet for the shallow section and 30 feet for the intermediate and deep sections. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.