My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE35010
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE35010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:44:44 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 2:26:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981041
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Name
RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR NORMA HEARING BY MLRB NOV CV 2000-010
Violation No.
CV2000010
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
transact insurance business in the state of Colorado. The suspension states that Frontier <br />failed to timely file its annual report and that Frontier no longer meets the statutory criteria <br />for licensure. The abatement deadline for this NOV was May 14, 2001. On May 15, 2001, <br />the Division issued a cessation order for, among other things, Powderhom's failure to abate <br />the April NOV. <br />The following brief responds to the arguments set forth in Powderhorn's first Petition <br />for a Fortnal Hearing regarding NOV 2000-010 (December NOV), although the subsequent <br />suspension of Powderhorn's license to do business in Colorado reflects on this NOV. The <br />Division will respond separately to Powderhom's second Petition for a Formal Hearing <br />concerning NOV 2001-005 (April NOV). <br />Introductory Note <br />The Colorado General Assembly, by enacting the coal statute, has created a <br />regulatory system in which an entity is allowed to conduct a mining operation if it complies <br />with regulatory requirements. One of the most important regulatory requirements is <br />providing adequate financial assurance that the operator will conduct and complete <br />reclamation of the mine site. By requiring an operator to not only promise to reclaim what it <br />disturbs but to also post a bond to ensure reclamation, the legislature has placed the burden <br />on the operator to ensure that reclamation is conducted. By these requirements, the <br />legislature has made a policy decision that the operator, and not the taxpayers of Colorado, <br />bear the cost of reclaiming a mine site. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.