Laserfiche WebLink
<br />IDLA 94-421 <br />contain locatable limestone, BIM relied on U.S. v. Foresvth, 100 IBl~. 185, <br />247-48, 94 I.D. 453, 487-88 (1987), in which it was held that limestone <br />containing 95 percent or greater total carbonates constitutes an uncanron <br />variety of limestone. <br />BLM's Decision informed MCR that a ccnmuv.ty pit had been established <br />effective October 21, 1993, that it covers a permitted disturbance area on <br />the abandoned claims, J and that the camnuiity pit "constitutes a superior <br />right to reauve material as against any subsequent claim or entry of the <br />land," citing 43 C.F.R. § 3604.1(b). BIM stated that it was not its inten- <br />tion to restrict or forbid the extraction of locatable grade material for <br />qualifying markets, and that it would allow limestone mining to proceed <br />within the pit boundazy, subject to certain restrictions. Specifically, <br />the letter pr~clude3 Appellants fran selling any of the waste matez-;.al on <br />the Calcite claims, including what it describes as limestone waste rock. <br />The Decision advised: <br />The abandorm~ent of the previous mining claims * * * under <br />which operations werE formerly conducted, serves as an abandon- <br />ment of any title or legal interest in the locatable m;nara~ <br />estate. As of September 1, 1993, any right that may have been <br />established by the previous claimant, lessee, or operator to <br />the limestone waste rock was lost to the U.S. Government. Hence, <br />none of the existing waste material present within the quarry, <br />regardless of how it was generated, can be sold fran the site by <br />the new claimants, their lessees, or operators. Anyone rt3roving <br />limestone waste roc frun the quarzy will be held accountable for <br />willful trespass of mine,-al material, <br />The Calcite mining claims located within the ccmn,n;ty pit <br />only establish a right to the royalty-free removal of locatable <br />grade limestone for qualifying locatable-grade end uses. <br />(Decision at 1-2.) Finally, BIM advised Appellants that it will be neces- <br />sary to revise the existing operating plan and mining permit to aclmowledge <br />these restrictions. <br />The abandoned Lion and Lyme claims were located on October 5, 1956, <br />by tree Colorado Fuel and Iron Corporation, later named CF&I Steel Corpora- <br />tion (CF&S), which leased the claims to MCR. Pitkin was the operator of <br />the claims under a "Quarry Operating Agrearent" with MCR. In a Memoran- <br />dum to BLM's Colorado State Director dated October 21, 1993, the Glenwood <br />Springs Resource Area Manager stated that MCR's primary market was its <br />plant in ~~*~~~~e, Colorado, where the limrestone was pulverized for use <br />as rock dust in MCR's coal mines. The material was also sold to the Craig <br />~ The disturbance area is situate-~3 in sec. 36 of T. 5 S., R. 89 W., <br />Sixth Principal Meridian, and consists of 210 acres caiprising Lots 3 and <br />4, tree AP/,NE~b, S~/SEl/,, and W~/aSE1j~E1/,. The Calcite Claims and the Stockpile <br />area occupy the wire grrnu~d to the extent of 140 acres in the SE'/, of sec. <br />36. (Decision at 1.) <br />148 ISLA 372 <br />