Laserfiche WebLink
proceedings. The Supreme Court has explicitly stated that such determinations aze not <br />reviewable. Id. <br />It could not be more cleaz that the Supreme Court has ruled that interim or interlocutory <br />orders of the type at issue in the present case are not final agency actions subject tojudicial <br />review by the district courts, given the holding of Colorado Health Facilities. Furthermore, the <br />Supreme Court has made it cleaz that when a district court attempts to heaz a case such as this <br />involving agency action which is not final, that district court will be found to have acted outside <br />its jurisdiction. For these reasons, the Court should decline here to assert jurisdiction over the <br />Plaintiffs judicial review case, and should dismiss the Complaint for Judicial Review and deny <br />the Plaintiffs' Application for Temporary Relief. <br />B. This Matter is Not Ripe for Review, and the Court Does Not Have Jurisdiction <br />Over This Matter, Because the Plaintiffs Have Failed to Exhaust Their Administrative <br />Remedies <br />Judicial review of an agency action is only available after the parties have exhausted their <br />administrative remedies. Boazd of Cosmetoloey v. District Court, 187 Colo. 175, 530 P.2d 1278 <br />(1974). Furthermore, it is appropriate for a district court to dismiss a judicial reo•iew action for <br />lack ofjurisdiction when the parties seeking relief fail to exhaust the administrative remedies that <br />could have afforded them complete relief in the matter. Kendal v. Cason, 791 P.2d ] 227 (Colo. <br />App. 1990). <br />In the current case, the Plaintiffs originally sought the Division's assistance in pursuing a <br />NOV against Basin. Given that the nature of the NOV issued by the Division was a finding that <br />Basin had caused damage to the Plaintiffs' property, and given that the abatement order <br />contained within the NOV ordered Basin to either repair the damage the Plaintiffs' property or to <br />9 <br />