My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1985-03-25_REVISION - M1983052 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1983052
>
1985-03-25_REVISION - M1983052 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2024 11:51:00 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 2:15:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1983052
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/25/1985
Doc Name
ADEQUACY REVIEW PN M-83-052 JOKER MINE & PILOT PLANT NOV M-85-013
From
MARATHON GOLD CORP
To
MLRD
Type & Sequence
HR1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
II r= <br /> 999 <br /> I <br /> MARATHON GOLD CORPORATION <br /> March 22 , 1985 <br /> Certified # P 713 145 215 <br /> Mr. Philip C. Saletta <br /> Hydrologist/Geological Engineer 41AR 2 5198� <br /> Mined Land Reclamation Division <br /> 423 Centennial Building if [",FJOflCCitG},�ATC,y0Hi1510{d <br /> 1313 Sherman Street <br /> Denver, Colorado 80203 0d1d.L ,. .oi Gt'I' 1 ,•'S`_'urce9 <br /> Re: Civil Penalty <br /> NOV No. M-85-013 <br /> Adequacy Review Joker Mine Amendment <br /> File No. 83-52 <br /> Dear Mr. Saletta : <br /> On February 28 , 1985, the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation <br /> Board found Marathon Gold Corporation in violation of Permit <br /> No. 83-52 . The CMLR Board assessed a civil penalty of $1000. 00. <br /> According, enclosed is Marathon Gold Corporation check number <br /> 2036 in the amount of $1000. 00 <br /> On February 25 , 1985, we received your adequacy review <br /> of the Joker Mine Amendment. You requested additional information <br /> regarding certain items, and commented upon others. Our response <br /> follows. <br /> A typical ( composite ) sample of detoxified cyanide <br /> process material will be analyzed for total cyanide, free cyanide, <br /> sulfate , and chloride . The results of such analysis will be <br /> submitted to the Division with the annual report. <br /> Regarding our choice of liner material for the laboratory <br /> waste disposal site, the elasticized polyolefin (E. P. ) material <br /> specified in the amendment is superior in performance to hypalon. <br /> However, hypalon is less costly and more readily available than <br /> E. P. We therefore agree to accept your recommendation to use <br /> hypalon. The amendment application is revised according. <br /> Your inspection report of November 30 , 1984 requests <br /> that we analyze water quality samples for CN total free . We <br /> will analyze water quality samples for both total CN and free <br /> CN as per your request in the adequacy review. <br /> 50 Spruce Street, Suite 400, Craig, Colorado 81625/303-824-8294 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.