Laserfiche WebLink
• • <br />1 prospectively; that is, with regard to future <br />2 off-site impact if the amended permit is approved, <br />3 and also retrospectively in terms of whether there's <br />4 past violation; is that correct? <br />5 CHAIRMAN DANIELSON: Not really. If <br />6 the, in my opinion, at any rate, if there's been a <br />7 violation that is a separate proceeding from this <br />B hearing, the purpose of the permit amendment: hearing <br />9 is simply to determine what the future activities <br />10 will be, and what the permit -- <br />11 MR. NUSSBAUM: If I could just ask for <br />12 the convenience of all of us who ride the bus from <br />13 Colorado Springs to these hearings, if that could be <br />14 scheduled, consideration of violation, the same day, <br />15 separate matter and separate hearing, if it could be <br />16 a separate hearing, maybe one in the morning, o_ne in <br />17 the afternoon. <br />18 CHAIRMAN DANIELSON : I zssume; if <br />19 there's such a hearing, the staff will schedule the <br />20 two hearings or. the sam e dap; is that correct:? <br />21 MP.. SANT A: Yes, w e will. <br />22 CHAIRMAN DANIELSOAT : That will be <br />23 done. <br />24 MR. E'VANS: Perhaps while this is <br />25 being consicered, we could a`_so seems a clarificaticn <br />61 <br />rrtTr)y~mT ncnpttTTNG SERVICr <br />;303) 424-2217 <br />