Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 be recognized that totally avoiding any roc}:s from <br />2 going into Williams Canyor. would be virtually <br />3 impossible. What they are saying is that tkiey want <br />4 this amendment permit approved where they ai•e allowed <br />5 to violate the law. <br />6 I feel that's irresponsible. We feel <br />7 they have already done so and violated the :law on <br />8 that aspect. They're asking you to approve the <br />9 amendment which would allow them to continuously <br />10 violate the law. The area which the rock s:.ides have <br />11 occurred ir. isn't on their property. It's off their <br />12 property. None of it is zoned for mining storage or <br />13 spillage. Once again, they are asking you '.o approve <br />14 the amendment which violates the law. <br />15 CHAIRMAN DANIELSON: Ms. Schmitt. <br />16 MS. SCH"^.ITT: I just have a r;nest_or.. <br />°-- 17 It's a more technical question, then the lawyers can <br />18 fight it out . But the issue is that I ur.de:-star.d <br />19 that you hav e got the 120 days, they do everything <br />20 they are sup posed to in the 120 days, the application <br />21 is granted. I know somewhere buried in you^ <br />22 regulations is something that says people c;ir. <br />23 object. The objectors have not been given the <br />24 opportunity to give a formal presentation o~~jecting <br />25 to it yet. It seems like maybe there's a <br />44 <br />MIDY°TT R°_°ORTI*IG S°RVIC~ <br />(303) 424-2217 <br />