Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 they want to fashion a very technical due process <br />2 argum ent, I think the Board can respond by saying <br />3 when was this application f iled. It couldn't be <br />4 filed unt il we knew what it was, and it talks about <br />5 trees and bushes and fairly lengthy phenomena -- it <br />6 gives the Board an opening to consider them together <br />T as th e le gislature intended you to do. The net <br />8 result of any argument would be, we end up :iot <br />9 talking about trees and bushes today. You leave <br />SO another hearing yet, we talk about rock slides, <br />11 trees, bushes and prior violation. all a t they same <br />12 time. They want to come back, I guess we wall come <br />13 back. <br />14 CHAIRMAN DANIELSON: Okay. Concerned <br />15 Citizens for Williams Canyon.. Do you have -- the <br />16 12o-day business we're going to ad dress on ce everyone <br />17 had a chance to review this motion which h as been <br />18 filed, but let's just talk, for a moment, about this <br />19 other question cf violation and how you think we <br />20 ought to proceed. <br />21 MS. SCHM_TTT: Carol Schmitt <br />22 S-c-h-m-i-t-t. I would echo what Mr. Nussbaum has <br />23 said. The history of the operator has been such that <br />24 there hasn't been just cause to provide ar_ <br />25 applicatio.^. such as this, give^ that there have been <br />2z <br />MIDYETT RE?ORT_ING SERVICE <br />(303) 424-2217 <br />