Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 today or in the August hearing, I do not know. <br />2 The operator himself, under their <br />3 presentation for the June 21 presentation that they <br />4 made, downplayed the same exact violation waere they <br />5 admitted that it occurred outside the -- or inside <br />6 the boundaries of the law and of another op=ration. <br />7 They had downplayed it at this location currently, <br />8 but the information has been before the Board for <br />9 months. There's no secret about it. And we have got <br />30 people that can testify to the extent of the <br />11 violations today, or add information to that. I feel <br />12 that allowing them to have the permit go through <br />13 automatically with the 120-period, without taking <br />14 into consideration these violations which have beer. <br />15 alleged in the preheating conference and the first <br />16 hearing date by the zpp'_icant himse'_f is not <br />17 congruous <br />18 CTIAIP.MP_N UANI°LSON: A, '_ tight. Tha^?~ <br />19 you very m_ch. Jim Nace'_, Cedar Heights Lenders wish <br />20 to zddress this issue? Mr. Martin 8ussbz~m. <br />21 M.:. NUSSBAUM: Just a brief ccmment. <br />22 It seers to me what Mt. Evans is trying to do is to <br />23 ask the Board to bifurcate consideration of the <br />24 application from consideratior. of the violation. <br />2° Obviously, in terms of an overall consideration of <br />20 <br />rtlDyr~n .:. ogoORTING S°RVIC° <br />(303) 424-2217 <br />