Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 whether a violation exists. There are procedural <br />2 rules which go with it, but most importantly, and I <br />3 presume this to have been in a spirit of trying to <br />4 keep as many of these procedural matters from the <br />5 Board as possible, that the Board has appro'~ed the <br />6 forms issued by the staff entitled Mineral Program <br />7 Inspection Report and one of these is dated, as I <br />8 indicated, the 4th of September, 1969, and t:he 30th <br />9 of October, 1989 -- the other one is dated t:he 30th <br />10 of October 1989. <br />11 Under these two provisions, I wou]d <br />12 request at this time that the letter of -- the <br />13 reason-to-believe letter dated July 17, 1989, that <br />14 there be direction issued that the letter be <br />15 withdrawn on the notice o: formal public hearing set <br />16 for August 24, 1969, and that the formal public <br />17 hearing be set consistent with the notice frcW the <br />18 staff already authorized by the Board to someti^.e <br />19 after September 4, 1989 as to one of the items and <br />20 that the November hearing 1989 as to the October 30 <br />21 items. <br />22 CF~SRMAN DA'tZEL50N: Okay. Tcaal you <br />23 very muck:. Now, I think we'1] give the objectors who <br />24 want to speak to -- you're certainly not req~iired <br />25 tc. Do a.^.y of the objectors wart to speak to this <br />is <br />MT_DYETT RE°ORTING SERVIC°_ <br />(303) 42,-2217 <br />