My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE34430
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE34430
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:44:23 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 2:10:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981026
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
11/1/1994
Doc Name
NOV C-94-024 CANADIAN STRIP C-81-026
From
DAVID BERRY
To
SUSAN MCCANNON
Violation No.
CV1994024
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />Date: November 1, 1994 <br />To: Susan McCannon <br />From: David Berry <br />Re: Notice of Violation C-94-024 - Canadian Strip - C-81-026 <br />This note is written in response to the request to vacate NOV C-94- <br />024, received on 10/31/94. <br />1. A large piece of plastic or rubber sheeting was observed in the <br />primary outlet structure. Our inspectors finally moved the plastic <br />during a follow-up inspection. It is likely that this obstruction <br />could result in flow retardance, given the configuration of the <br />outlet. <br />Additionally, this situation was noted by the consulting engineer <br />during his 10/93 pond inspection, and the report states: <br />"Clear the principal spillway of the plastic sheeting and the <br />outfall of excessive vegetation growth to avoid restrictions of <br />flow. This work should be accomplished prior to the next <br />anticipated discharge of water from the primary spillway (high <br />water season)" <br />It was the operator's (and/or consultant's) responsibility to <br />ensure that this occurred. The spillway was not cleared, and a <br />violation was written after a year of inaction. <br />2. The inslope of the pond has experienced significant erosion, <br />and this is a violation. Protection should be provided now so as <br />to avoid more catastrophic results later. This is a permanent <br />impoundment, and erosion of the observed magnitude should not be <br />occurring. <br />3. The emergency spillway riprap has weathered completely. The <br />10/93 (last year) consulting engineer report stated that the riprap <br />should be replaced. We were aware of the currently approved plan <br />when the violation was written, and the referenced Phase II release <br />has nothing to do with the situation. If a change to the approved <br />riprap requirement is desired, then a revision can be considered. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.