My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE34390
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE34390
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:44:22 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 2:09:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Name
CIVIL ACTION 01-CV-38
Violation No.
CV2000009
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />United States Department of the Interior <br />OFFICE OF HL~RINGS ANC) APPErLLS <br />Inr<nor Baca of Land Appals <br />4U 1 S ullson Boulnud <br />.irLn6ron, Urginia 2]]01 <br />~~ ,[rtr gfFC, Tp <br />C~./I'YLI 4..V . <br />V• <br />OFFICE OF sIIiFACE NLIl~]II,1G RECT,»9~TICSN ADID EI~VI~Et93SP <br />(ON R7]~1SIDERATION ) <br />ZBL4 93-458 Decided February 9, 1995 <br />Petition for reronsideration and request for reconsideration en Banc <br />of Board decision in Po+zierhorn Coal Co. v. 09'7, 129 IBLA 22 11994) . <br />Petition for reconsideration.granted in part and denied in part; <br />decision reaffirmed as clarified. <br />Surface Mi~Ling Control and Reclamation A~^t of 1917: <br />'I~oraty Aelief: Applications-Su-face Mi.ting Control <br />and Reclamation Act of 1977: 'I~anparary Relief : F,Vidence <br />A substantial. likelihoczi of suooess on tl:e merits <br />required to be shown by an applicant fcs t~npnrary <br />relief from a citation under sec. 525(c) of SM~iP., <br />may be found where applicatlt has raised issues on the <br />merits of the case so ^seriws, substantial, difficult <br />and doubtful" as to make them appropriate for delihPr- <br />ative resolution in a decision on the merits, rather <br />than in a preliminary detpzmis7ation on the application <br />for tel~orary relief. The finding required to support <br />temporary relief is properly distinguished from the <br />basis of a final decision on the merits. Thus, when <br />we are unable to uphold the enforcatpnt action as a <br />preliminary matter on the basis of the record before <br />us, a showing of a substantial likelihood of success on <br />the merits has been made which will justify temporary <br />relief assuming the other statutory criteria are met. <br />APPFI~AFINCES: John 5. Retrum, Esq., Office of the Field Solicitor, U.S. <br />DeparGrnsLt of the Interior, Denver, Colorado, for the office of Surface <br />Mining Reclamation and Enforcement; Robert 5. Mote, Esq., office of the <br />Solicitor, Washington, D.C., of counsel; M. Julia Hook, Esq., and Kenneth <br />D. Hubbard, Esq., Denver, Colorado, for the Powderhorn Coal Company. <br />132 IHLA 36 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.