Laserfiche WebLink
B <br /> • • <br /> 1 order. <br /> 2 MR <br />O'CONNOR <br />h <br />d <br /> . <br />: I <br />ave a comment an <br />a <br />L 3 question. The first comment is that the record will <br /> 4 reflect th at I have missed some of the proceedings <br /> 5 involvin this issue in the la <br />t <br />l <br />f <br />th <br /> g s <br />coup <br />e o <br />mon <br />s. <br /> 6 However, I have been provided and have read all of <br /> 7 the transc ripts involving Castle Concrete, and for <br /> e that reaso n <br />I feel that I'm com <br />etent to <br />artici <br />ate <br /> , <br />p <br />p <br />p <br /> 9 in these p roceedings today. Absent hearing some <br /> l0 objections from some folks, that that is my <br />' 11 intention <br /> . <br /> 12 CHAIRMAN DANIELSON: I would simply <br /> 13 say that, because the notice of violation hearing is <br /> 14 se <br />arate plies to <br />that I think that comment mainly a <br /> p <br />, p <br /> 15 the second -- <br /> 16 MR. O'CONNOR: That's exactly right. <br /> 17 .The second quEStio.n I .guess : S :h av~e~, .Lo.u.,.. is..~in .. .. <br /> 18 connection with opening your prehearing -- your draft <br /> 19 prehearing order up for comment from the public. <br /> 20 During the prehearing process, did you already hear <br /> 21 arguments from the public regarding the different <br /> 22 issues that are addressed in here? <br /> 23 CHAIRMAN DANIELSON: Yes. Not from <br />1 24 the public , but from those who requested to be <br /> 25 parties. <br />1 <br /> MIDYETT REPORTING SERVICE <br /> (303) 424-2217 <br />