Laserfiche WebLink
70 <br /> <br /> 1 is going to come in today. I think that:'s what they <br />' 2 must have thou <br />ht at the time th <br />i <br />it <br />d M <br /> g <br />ey v <br />s <br />e <br />r. Carey, <br />' 3 which might have affected his opinion in that <br /> 4 letter. I would object on the basis of that letter: <br />' 5 One <br />it's hearsa <br />and <br />two <br />well <br />rimaril <br /> , <br />y; <br />, <br />, <br />, p <br />y <br /> 6 hearsay. I object to Exhibit 0 which i=_ the Gazette <br /> 7 Telegraph article. <br />' 8 CHAIRMAN DANIELSON: Get back to the <br /> 9 Carey letter. You seem to have a -- what may well <br /> 10 turn out to be persuasive reason why we shouldn't <br />' 11 accord that letter much, if any credibility as to ~ <br />' 12 admissibility, gieen the standards we generally <br /> 13 employ. I think under our standard it should be <br />' 14 regarded as admissible. I will admit. <br />' 15 M°. NUSSBAUM: We object to admission <br /> 16 of Exhibit 0 which is a a Gazette Telegram article <br />;~•_ <br />17 <br />which is hear.say.....up.on .heaFS:ay_.abou2. state.m:ent.s.:..made.. .. <br /> <br />1 18 by Governor Romer._ Again, we don't get a chance to <br /> 19 cross-examine him nor do we know if he even has any <br />' 20 firsthand knowledge regarding these things on the <br /> 21 grounds of the value of that exhibit and the <br /> <br /> 22 relevancy and hearsay. We would object to it. <br />' 23 CHAIPMAN DANIELSON: I would say, Mr. <br /> 24 Briggs, in general, when this objection has been <br />' <br /> 25 raised, we excluded from evidence newspaper articles, <br /> <br /> MIDYETT REPORTING SERVICE <br />' {303) 424-2217 <br />