Laserfiche WebLink
65 <br />' • • <br /> 1 sediment pond should be considered for this site -- <br /> 2 i <br />thi <br />it <br /> n <br />s s <br />e. <br /> 3 Q Between February of 1989 and when we <br /> 4 received the notice letter in July, there was no <br />' 5 staff activit <br />o <br />thi <br />d i <br />th <br />? <br /> y <br />n <br />s roa <br />ssue, was <br />ere <br />' 6 A That's correct. <br /> 7 MR. BRIGGS: Could we have, as an <br />' E exhibit, I have a whole bunch of exhibits for our <br />' 9 part of the case, which will include the inspection <br /> 10 reports, and I need the direction there from the <br />' 11 hearing examiner as to whether or not I want to try <br />' 12 to get them in piecemeal or do it all at one time. <br /> 13 CHAIRMAN DANIELSON: Has anybody <br />' 14 objected to anything? <br />' 15 MR. BRIGGS: Mr. Nussbaum has a few <br /> 16 objections. He apparently objects to the <br />.. <br />~'.:_. <br /> <br />2T <br /> <br />au.thenticity of Mr... Statten,'s .r.epor.ts.... <br /> <br />' 18 CHAIRMAN DAATIELSON: Are you planning <br /> 19 on using Mr. Statten's report with this Nitness? <br />' 20 MP.. BRIGGS: Yes. I questioned him <br /> 21 about it. <br />' <br /> 22 CHAIRMAN DANIELSON: Oh, ,all right. <br />' 23 Okay. Mr. Nussbaum, what objections do you have to <br /> 24 the Statten report? <br />' <br /> 25 MR. NUSSBACIM: Scott, whi~~h exhibit is <br /> <br /> MIDYETT REPORTING SERVICE <br />' (303) 424-2217 <br />