My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE34280
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE34280
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:44:19 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 2:07:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977210
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Name
REPORTERS TRANSCRIPT
Violation No.
MV1989015
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
180
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5 <br /> • • <br /> 1 also filed. <br /> 2 One of these motions is the motion of <br /> <br /> 3 Castle Concrete for a separate hearing; that is, as I <br /> 4 am sure most of you are aware, there is a, at the <br /> 5 same time <br />here <br />oin <br />on a <br />roceedin <br />relatin <br />to <br /> , <br />, g <br />g <br />p <br />g <br />g <br /> 5 the issuance of a permit for -- a permit amendment, <br /> 7 e~:cuse me, for Castle Concrete. Castle Concrete <br /> 8 filed a motion in which they requested that the <br /> <br /> 9 hearings be separate and distinct, and I have <br /> 10 recommended that that be the procedure the Board <br />~~ 11 follovrs. Indeed, I am not sure we have ar.y <br />1 12 opposition on thzt. <br /> 13 The second matter that way raised in <br />~r 14 that motion was Castle requested that th~a permit <br /> 15 amer.dmer.t be heard first and the notice of ciolatior. <br /> 1F be heard second. I have recommended that the -- that <br />•~. 17 portion of she motion, that. be granted; Ne hold the <br /> 18 notice of violation hearing first. <br /> 1~ The second matter is that there was a <br /> 20 motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for a <br /> 21 continuance of this proceeding by Castle Concrete and <br /> 22 I have recommended that that motion be denied. I <br />1 23 would say that motion also requested a c~~ntinuance, <br /> 24 at lezst in zn alternative, requested z ~:ontinuance <br /> 25 c,+ith respect to the permit proceeding. <br /> <br /> MIDYETT REPORTING SERVICE <br />(303; 424-2217 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.