Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />I3 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />• 25 <br />nq <br />i <br />to work to get the additional permit= submitted and we have ~ <br />submitted four' since that date. Three: were subm;t<<~d to the <br />Board in October of 1977 and no action has beer, ta!•:en. <br />Three permit applications came in and they have be •n here <br />almost three years and the other three came in in 1 believe <br />June and then the 7th one just yesterday. <br />We have be n moving fast any} diligFnt.ly rand i ~ <br />think probably in another month or t_wo, they will F~ we the <br />combination permit on the smr <br />be in. <br />,i _;, <br />-- : .i e:ve.r•.~ pr•~r:it will <br />I <br />CHAIRMAN TURNER: What I hear is good far <br />I <br />as the submissions. The three that were submitted in ~ <br />I <br />'77, I understand there ware deficiencies in them. The i <br />deficiencies were sent back to the County and no r~• ~y was j <br />made. <br />MR. SEIELTON: That is correct and thos~. <br />deficiencies, I believe, have been ta'an care of by statute <br />now. In going back through, it turne<~ nut that they had <br />no application fee, which at that time was roa,air~d of <br />counties, and is no longer required. So by sta,_u ~• now, <br />I <br />they essentially have become complete and in diacring throu4'; <br />the County's files, we have discovered this and w.• arc' ' <br />I <br />taking action on all where that was the issue anu Weld j <br />County wasn't atone in submitting applications ;-~~ ~_hout F,~e:, <br />at that time. <br />3S' <br />