ENFORCE34244

• Permit No: M1980149
• IBM Index Class Name: Enforcement
• Doc Date: 7/23/1980
• Doc Name: TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

3-

1
2
3
4
5
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23 i
24
25
DP. C tOWN: P''/er• rnunt~~ th ~ _ '• mina Gravel
has h d to f'1e~
MR. D1~vID: ThaF isn't the information ' have.
pr };'nGIN: Ther, they will o throuc;h the ~~~mc
thing.
CJii~IRP1APJ T!:RPJI'!': D. ck?
Dk. F;C1iF.R~ [JARI': C w<,s just respond.. fio
Chips in the scr,se sa:~inq that, you }:near, hc'c .,. ~~ --
I think he's agcceinq will, rig that r.J•, ~~ is more rt.~nce
to the whole pic•~ure than s~i-re iy two c' .~: s ~~f viol: >n,
NIN. fSARRY: 'i'hctc' .is, i'here is more sul,s~..in~.•c,
Dick, but on the other hand, ~~,• feelir•g is 1 d'~ want. to
spend hours unravelling it a1i, hecau:.e ii: isn't worth it.
MR. i~]OOll: if 7 may puke ~~: observatic^. a7onq
that line. 'J'he recommend,,tior. o sta' f today is ~t';or
specific, buL- maY.ing a de L rminati.on '_n nccord..nc or ri7orn~
the lines of that particu7~r recommen.'ation do.~s not fore-
close the Board from hearing further recornmendati:~.ns from
staff at such time a~ staf` mry see i .t to presc~~ -u7c'.it:ion
al e•'idence, but it would save th~r bca:~]'s time t~ :~l.l.ow
staff to develop specific recommendations and spe~~Pic ~f~tri
rath~.~r than having u:'. to try to ,'ici._: it piecemeal if the '
Boar.l wants to do it, rather :.hen try to do i_t tc. y :;!-,~_~n
we're operating under. adverse conditions. It woi'.d be
better to allow the Division to develop it wit':r.~re