My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE34244
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE34244
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:44:18 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 2:05:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980149
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
7/23/1980
Doc Name
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
17' <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />• 13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />MR. J,',.NES: VJCLd County. ~ <br />D3. R CIIARD 4JARD: Okay. P. r, c'. a C&D -- c?id we <br />get response to that from the Cowtty? <br />MR. WOOD: The Cease and Desist Order was <br />issued by this Board in .7une of 1975, :•~hareupon Weld <br />County filed an :action claiming the Cease and Desist Order <br />was not validly issued and then st~bs~c•.i,.a discu..:ion <br />occurred. <br />DR. RICHARD WAP ~: What way their re:~s~ r for <br />invalidity? <br />MR. WOOD: They asserted nu:ny grounds :.rcluclin~ ~ <br />i <br />unconstitutionality of the statute and a lot of other ~ <br />things. I think the grounds are not :;uffic.ic:~t r '..ly, but i <br />the action is pending, but due to inf:rn;al wlderstandings <br />at the time, Weld County was pursuing application,,; for <br />permits, and so it was agreed ghat tl~,• civil acti - ~.entld <br />not be pursued because it would be nonproductive. <br />DR. RiCIIARD WARD: Did they at a.ll say ~~;e one <br />not operating that pit? VVas that one of their rer:~;ons <br />for invalidity? <br />MR, l•JOOD: No, they did not. <br />MR. DAVID: I think it is co be mad, ~'~ar this <br />pit wasn't even -- we knew -- the pit that we'~~ ~.lkind <br />about hasn't been in existence for al~~ost a year ,end a-half <br />or almost two years. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.