My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE34211
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE34211
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:44:17 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 2:04:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1984065
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
6/29/1994
Doc Name
NOV C-94-009 COAL RIDGE 1 MINE
From
NCIG FINANCIAL INC
To
DMG
Violation No.
CV1994009
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~_ <br />III Illlllllllllllll <br />999 <br />0029 Glen Eagle Circle <br />New Casde. Colorado 81647 <br />N CIG FINANCIAL, 1N C. <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />13.1 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Telephone 303/984-3655 <br />Fax 303/984-3657 <br />June 24, 1994 <br />RErEI~EQ <br />JUN 2 9 <br />Att: Assessment Officer <br />NOV C-94-009 OivisionotA~inEraisaGeaugy <br />Coal Ridge No, 1 Mine <br />With reference to the captioned Notice of Violation, <br />it is respectfully that the abatement period be extended <br />until new documents will be furnished to operator by the <br />Division. <br />Copies of the subject documents are not in the <br />possession of Operator. Staff of the Division advised <br />that two sets of the documents were mailed to Operator's <br />California address. One copy was supposed to be returned <br />to the Division after execution. Owner of Operator, who <br />resides in California, has no recollection that such <br />documents were received, nor were any found after a <br />search of the company's files, However, since the <br />Division mails all such documents via registered mail, <br />such mailing can be, undoubtedly, verified. Apparently, <br />no copy was sent to Operator's local office. DMG's files <br />supposedly also do not contain a copy, which is <br />understandable as originals were apparently never <br />received by Operator. <br />Please note, that at the time of mailing, Operator's <br />California office was moved from Los Angeles to the San <br />Francisco area. Perhaps, the documents were not <br />Operator's personnel of the local office in New <br />Castle is responsible for maintaining the public records. <br />Since the documents apparently got lost between Denver <br />and California, local personnel was not aware of the <br />documents as such nor that they were missing. <br />~~Iliiar,;-ri~i~~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.