My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1992-02-19_REVISION - C1981038
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981038
>
1992-02-19_REVISION - C1981038
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/20/2021 2:44:11 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 2:02:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
2/19/1992
Doc Name
Midterm Review Findings Document
From
MLRD
To
CYPRUS ORCHARD VALLEY COAL CORP
Type & Sequence
MT2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Midterm Review <br /> Orchard Valley and Orchard Valley West Mines <br /> (C-81-038) <br /> This document presents the results of the Division' s Midterm Review of the <br /> Cyprus Orchard Valley Coal Corporation, Orchard Valley and Orchard Valley West <br /> Mines . This Midterm Review was conducted to fulfill the requirements of <br /> Rules 2.08.3, 2 .06.200) , 2.06.3(4) , 2.06.5(3) , 2.06.7(5) , and 3.02.2(4) . <br /> Rule 2.08.3 requires that the Division conduct a review of each permit issued, <br /> prior to its midterm (2 1 /2 years) . Based on this review, for good cause <br /> shown, the Division may require reasonable revisions or modifications of the <br /> permit provisions to ensure compliance with the Act and Regulations . <br /> Rules 2 .06.2, 2 .06. 3, 2.06.5 and 2.06.7 require that experimental practices , <br /> mountain top removal variances, variances from approximate original contour <br /> (AOC) , and variances from contemporaneous reclamation, respectively, be <br /> reviewed by the Division where applicable during the midterm review. <br /> Rule 3.02.2(4) requires that the Division review the amount of the bond and <br /> the terms of acceptance of the bond every 2 1 /2 years . <br /> This midterm review consisted of a detailed review of the Orchard Valley and <br /> Orchard Valley West Mine permit application and Findings Document to identify <br /> any items that may have been overlooked during the initial review. The <br /> Division also reviewed all subsequent revisions and stipulation responses to <br /> ensure that all permit commitments and conditions were being followed . <br /> Hydrologic monitoring data was reviewed in conjunction with the review of the <br /> application to assess the adequacy of the monitoring plan and discussion of <br /> hydrologic impacts. Problems and observations from past inspection reports <br /> were also considered. <br /> -1- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.