Laserfiche WebLink
<br />/ <br />f III IIIIIIIIIIIII III <br /> <br />SPRING DATA RECEIVED AND WHEN <br />***ik************~,tf~***,t,t,t,t,t**~t,t,t*,t,t,t**,t,-,t,t~~,t *rt,t**~************ <br />A-2 4th Q visit \ iJ6/95 at assessment conference <br />A-2 1st Q visit \ 1/6/95 at assessment conference <br />- A-2 March visit \ none <br />A-2 April visit \ 1/6/95 at assessment conference <br />C-1 4th Q visit \ 1/6/95 at assessment conference <br />C-1 1st Q visit \ 1/6/95 at assessment conference <br />- C-1 March visit \ none <br />C-1 April visit \ 1/6/95 at assessment conference <br />C-2 4th Q visit \ 1/6/95 at assessment conference <br />C-2 1st Q visit \ 1/6/95 at assessment conference <br />- C-2 March visit \ none <br />C-2 April visit \ 1/6/95 at assessment conference <br />Springs discovered flowing at greater than 35 gpm in May of 1993 <br />are as follows: <br />O, Mine 1, C-1, D, E, M2-87, Q, R <br />The requirements for each of these springs would be May flow and <br />field parameters as well as a full suite sample. Again, the chart <br />below details the information to-date for those sites originally <br />determined to be deficient. <br />SPRING DATA RECEIVED AND WHEN <br />- O May 93 visit \ no full suite sample received ~_ <br />- O 3rd Q visit \ none <br />.l)r. <br />-- Mine 1 May 93 \ no full suite sample received---~ ~ 7/ <br />Mine 1 3rd Q \ none ' • . •; r!~ . <br />• ~. C-1 3rd Q visit\ 1/6/95 at assessment conference - ~!! ••4 I~" ~~,~ <br />' ~ ~ ~i,~~ <br />M2-87 May 93 \ Full suite provided by FAX 10/14/94 <br />--- M2-87 3rd Q \ none ~ ~''.' <br />It is worth noting that for sites listed which show that eventually <br />the data was received, in no case was data received BEFORE the <br />fourth request from the Division and for 10 of 19 sites the data <br />was received at the time of the assessment conference, well after <br />the EXTENDED abatement date of December 9, 1994. It would be <br />inappropriate to accept data after abatement of a violation, <br />particularly when the abatement procedures specifically requested <br />as a step to abate the violation that all missing data be provided. <br />If this data were to be accepted, it could only be done under a <br />FTACO, where a penalty of $750.00 per dayt would be assessed from <br />December 10, 1994 to January 6, 1995. The Division requests that <br />the original penalty of $1,250.00 be upheld. <br />If you have questions, please call me. ~1rrc /« <br />~'~C4... "fir,-. <br />-~~ . <br />r~ ~ ~ - ~7 <br />~ _F., <br />r, <br />2' r ~ ~: <br />