ENFORCE34064

• Permit No: C1981021
• IBM Index Class Name: Enforcement
• Doc Date: 9/22/1981
• Doc Name: CHRONOLOGY
• Violation No.: CV0000000
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

-.~-
4
Qascd on thi :, t.hr Oi vir:inri prnpnsr Ilr,rt fJri r~ur.q~.xr~•n/. c~,ntrrLal.r• 5750.00
of the proposed civil pcnnl ty.
4. Thus, the total prol,nscrl cf vi L Pena 1 ty for tmV Al - 14 i
{100.00 !or hisCOnl
7i0. 00 for sc ri ousnra s
750. U0 for F'tn,Jt
J ,600. UO Totnl proposed ei vi / pen•il ty
Notice of violation A]-15
1. The component for lustonl is not rlispul~:d, $JOO.nO is assessed for' this.
2. The assessment of thr• seriousness component Cnc failure to construct
sediment control .is based on thn probability n( rlnma~te occurrence and thn
duration and extent of thr• r)mm~yn. Thn evir]encc pro;rvttorl indicatcrl that,
at the time of thr. vioLiL ion, rlmm~ ye rlid ants oc'cu r. Thn potenCinJ for rlmm~gc
is not known because of the lack of data thnC would normally he available in
a permit that wou,Id indicnC~~ the type of sorliment control nnrl the structures
necessary to mitigate thr, pot~•ntinl en vironmvtt:a] ,Inmaq~•. ^n;r,7 wt this, the
Division proposes tltirt this; rump oncuC cent ri hate 5200. nn to Lhr~ ci vi] penalty.
There .is rte disanrr:ern,.nt that the compnnent for dur•rLirnt and cr.tont should he
minimal. The Division propose 5150.00 for thin. cnml>oncnt of the c•ivi] penalty.
3. The Division agrr.•cs r.~iCh h'nlden Coal Conq>nny that the rlcyrer_ of fault
in this violation is bnscrl on negligence. Since the npcnitor fnilcrl to find
out what the requirements Inr sediment cent ml c,•err. Inr the area, it appears
that he was demonstrating sonic indifference tT the cnmpliancr_ requiremr•.nts,
particularly since the opet~~tnr has her_n cited previously for .~ similar
violation (NOV AO-20). 'Phe Division propose; that this component contribute
5250.00 to the civil penalty.
4. Therefore, the total proposed civil penalty far NUV Al-15 is:
5160.00 for history
5350.00 for scriousn~-::;
5250. UO bur I'nu) t
x700.00