Laserfiche WebLink
J-~ ~ R_CEIVCD <br /> <br /> <br />1'/1VING C(Jr:?l'/1NY <br /> IdIClU InND RCCI nIAnIlO'I~COnf <br />• ~ CGiO GCJI. Of la/.1 U7nL v:;UJ0.Cf5 <br />POST OFFICE a0X 229, aOUL UCR, COLORADO OOJ02 f'rIONE: (JOJ) eA4.2151 <br />September 18, 1980 <br />Mr. David Shelton, Director <br />Mined Land Reclamation Board <br />1313 Sherman Street, 4th Floor <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Dear Dave: <br />At the hearing on the }3oury coal mine possihle violation September 8, <br />1980 you stated that the hearing would remain open pending a review <br />of the state statute on L-hc rlucstion of whnthcr .it reduires a miner <br />to use material for scrlimentation pond dams f.r.om the pond area or whether <br />the possibility remains open f:or a miner Co consCruct the clam with <br />appropriate overburden C+:om clsr•wherc on site, Flatiron took the later <br />course in its construction of darns .in openi.ny up f_he mine. <br />Soth you and Fred assured Flatiron that no legal riyhts were bci.ng <br />waived, especially In L-erms of t.i.me periods within r.~h,i.ch the company <br />would need to take action in regard to defending itself nrrninr;t t-hc <br />charge of violation. '1'hi~ letter is meant ns wrifCen verific,ltinn <br />that all Flatiron's riyhts in this maLCer remain intact while the <br />conference decision is pcnd.ing. <br />Please let me know <br />for our case. As <br />tion". This case <br />violation" record <br />if we can provide further <br />you }:now,.wc have r:cyuccted <br />is very important to us ns <br />for our operation at Doury, <br />infc,rmation or defense <br />a ruling of "no viola- <br />part of Lhe "pattern of <br />Si.ncr~rel.y, <br />- u_ <br />~~ D <br />(t•irs.) t9aryaret Winter <br />