Laserfiche WebLink
.' <br />Memo to ('i le No. C-O'1-'+I (l:nur~J :;t ri;,) ... <br />May 20, 1981 <br />Page 2 <br />C. Fault: (The vin].~tinn i:as .hre G~ (:roll Rrcnt.rr throe negligence, <br />since the operator stntCd the area would not be di~turbnd.) <br />The penalty for fault c/renter than neylicrence is levied at 51,000.00. <br />Total Assessnicn~ For NOV 81-14: <br />This value was rounded to: <br />NOV 81-IS <br />Fault Tota.L: 51,000.00 <br />$2,558.3) <br />52,SG0.00 <br />A. Jlistonl: (Gourd ha^, had two violations i:aucrt within the last <br />year, NOV 80-2.9 (8/G/80) and NOV 80-39 (]0/7.8/RO)). <br />For each violation, $50.00 must be asses^crl. <br />Q. seriousness: <br />Ili story 'J'o tal: $ 100.00 <br />1. ProhabiliLU of r7ccuren ce: (I)a ma ye was .)if:ely to occur due to <br />the marshy nntur!• of the surrounding area .mrl high avatar Cable.) <br />Since da ma yc w.is likely to occur, an .,sscss m_v,t of $645.75 was <br />assessed. <br />2. Duration noel F.xLcnt of Violation: <br />a. Ow-aL ii,n: (n long rlu ro ti on Yirne was ,rss r_ssed since no <br />plans have been rr_crived which wouj~l indicate a correction <br />of the problem.) Sin m a lorry duration time was assessed, <br />the penalty is 5437.50. <br />b. GxtanL: (The extent was relatively small, loss than 10 <br />acres.) The penalty for small extent is placed at 5145.83. <br />Seriousness Total: 51,238.08 <br />C. Fault: (The violation was due to fault greater than negligence. <br />The operator received a previous violation for the same offense.) <br />The penalty ran, L.•vir•d nC $1,250.00 <br />Total Assessment for NqV 8I-15: <br />This value wa.s rounr7ed to: <br />Fault Total: 51,250.00 <br />$2,58A.08 <br />$2,590.00 <br />