Laserfiche WebLink
Haain Resources would lilco EoL~you to cnn,tirirs all the above e~ <br />information in your determination as to adverse impact upon Mr. <br />Tatum's windmill well by the vent shaft. A number of assumptions <br />were made whlen are noc correct .• ~,e lJUtC„Lii~i-G~YCY`Se impact en <br />the well must take into account aM-facts as-they exist noc6. There <br />ie currently 43'-of water in the weii. Ttin aw+lr~+es bare szif-3.oa. <br />There is no Historical doc:uu~,Lativn-vr evidence s:ndioato pro- <br />ahaft water elevations. The productivity of the well prior to and <br />arf tar Gk,nlt acnctrucCinn hwc not hc~sl~OP.uII1P,nted OY DXOVOn~ The <br />well ha& haPn in a state of disre air for at least 10 ears with no <br />evidence of use. Mr. Tatum has never used, repatYed, or ces ,~-- <br />..~]l ;~, nrei~r to verify his cl,rics fnr drr~imental affects of the <br />shaft to his well. <br />PAGE 3 <br />neain believes the claims Mr. Tatum-hns made -hwc no baoie <br />other than accusations which can not substantiated. There ie no <br />evidenee to prove his contentions. The Division should consider <br />only the facts in its resDOnse to OSM. If you have 621"r Diu=o~.ic,i`o - <br />or require additional information, please call. <br />Sincerely, <br />Ralph Lopez <br />Environmental Engineer <br />~.~ <br />