Laserfiche WebLink
1.0 <br /> 1.4 <br /> 0.9 <br /> Mn, dissolved + team(mainly failings) <br /> 0.6 13 pH 7 Della(mainly sludge) <br /> �-&riser(mainly sludge) <br /> 01 3-dam(tailings-rich) 1.2 <br /> + "am(mainly talffngs) <br /> --�- Delta(sludge-rich) <br /> 8-riser(sludge-nrh) 1.1 <br /> +0.5 Sdam(tatngs-rich) <br /> C`1 e <br /> V 1J 1.0 <br /> 0.4 V <br /> 0.3 O.B <br /> 0.2 0.8 <br /> O.t 0.7 • <br /> 0.0 <br /> 0 5 10 15 20 25 0.6 <br /> 0 5 10 15 20 25 <br /> Fluid-sludge ratio Fluid-sludge ratio <br /> 1.5 <br /> r 3 14 <br /> Ca, dissolved I + 3-dam(mainly IaRinga) <br /> 7; 1.0 pH g - Delta(mainly sludge) <br /> 1.1 - &riser(mainly sludge) <br /> 1.0 r _ • ■ 1.2 -� 5-dam(mainly tailings) <br /> 0.8 <br /> 1.1 <br /> 0.8 <br /> l3 0 7 U 1.0 ----�� ■ <br /> 0.6 I v • <br /> 0.5 � 3-dam(tailings-rich) 0.9 • <br /> OA + Delta(sludge-rich) <br /> 0.3 &riaer(sludga-rich) 0.8 <br /> 0.2 -} 5dam(tairings-rich) <br /> 0.1 0.7 <br /> 0.0 <br /> 0 5 10 15 20 25 I 0.6 <br /> 0 5 10 15 20 25 <br /> Fluid-sludge ratio Fluid sludge ratio <br /> Figure 4. plots of concentration of Mn and Ca versus fluid-sludge ratio in leachate derived from I the SBE for the four Mayflower samples,using lixivient with inilial pH of 7. Figure S. Plots o(conduclivity versus fluid-sludge redo in leechate derived from the SBE for the <br /> four Mayflower samples,using lixiviant with initial pH of 7 and 9. <br /> 662 663 <br />