Laserfiche WebLink
NOV CV-99-014 <br />Raton Creek Mine <br />This NOV was issued for failure to obtain approval of reclamation plans prior to <br />implementing those proposed plans. The operator performed some interseeding <br />and constructed contour furrows on a portion of the reclaimed mine where no <br />topsoil had been replaced. The operator had submitted a minor revision <br />application proposing this work. The Division had indicated that the proposed <br />work would not adequately address problems with the area that had been <br />reclaimed without topsoil. The operator implemented the proposed plans <br />anyway. <br />HISTORY <br />Two NOV's (#99-010 and 99-011) have been issued at this mine during the past <br />twelve months. Notice and Orders to Pay were issued for both NOV's on <br />December 3, 1999. Since the periods available for appeal for these NOV's have <br />not expired, they are not included in the history component of this assessment. <br />No penalty is assessed for history. <br />SERIOUSNESS <br />This was an administrative violation. The work cited in the NOV, which was <br />completed by the operator prior to approval of proposed plans, consisted of <br />supplemental reclamation efforts. Questions about the usefulness of these <br />efforts had not been addressed in the permitting process. However, <br />implementation of the plans did not obstruct the Division's ability to enforce <br />compliance with the approved permit or prohibit further work from being done in <br />the future. No penalty is assessed for seriousness. <br />FAULT <br />The need for additional reclamation work and a revised reclamation plan had <br />been pointed out to the operator and discussed with Division personnel more <br />than a year prior to issuance of this NOV. Letters notifying the operator of the <br />Division's concerns with the proposed plans were sent to the operator. The <br />operator chose to implement the proposed plans prior to resolving concerns <br />identified by the Division and prior to obtaining approval of the proposed plans, <br />as required by Rule 2.08.4(4). $250 is assessed for a low degree of negligence. <br />GOOD FAITH <br />Since the NOV has not been abated, consideration of good faith is not relevant at <br />this time. <br />