My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE33658
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE33658
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:44:01 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 1:51:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
1/12/2007
Doc Name
Request for Vacation Memo and Attachments
From
Kent Gorham
To
David Berry
Violation No.
CO2006007
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Peak Project Management, LLC <br />34115 County Road 20.8 <br />Trinidad, CO 81082 <br />Telephone/Fax: (719) 846-4975 <br />Cell: (719) 858-0'111 <br />e-mail: ronthompson~sensonlcs.org <br />December 19, 2006 <br />Mr. Kent Gorham <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Re: New Elk Mine Permit No.: C-81-012 <br />CV-2006-003 <br />Dear Mr. Gorham: <br />R'~~~1 V F~- --- - <br />DEC Z U?006 <br />DivMinin °f Rrcia'nation <br />9 and Safety <br />Picketwire Processing hereby requests that the closure order issued as a result of a delay m abating the <br />above violation for failure to post adequate bond be vacated. As noted in the violation assessment <br />conference, Picketwve Processing and New Elk Coal Company were actively pursuing an adequate letter of <br />credit and/or surety bond to comply with the Bonding requvement for the New Elk Mine prior to and after <br />issuance of the violation. <br />Subsequent to the issuance of the violation, both companies and potential bonding agents kept the Division <br />updated relative to progress regazding the issuance of the requved bond. Regulations permit the Division to <br />issue extensions, if wan•anted,pf up to ninety days for abatement of a violation. Given the diligent pursuit <br />of adequate bonding by PPLLC and NECC and the submittal of adequate bonding to the Division prior to <br />the end of the ninety day period, the closure order should be vacated. <br />Your consideration of this request is appreciated. If you have any questions, please contact me. <br />Sincerely, <br />~o" <br />Ron Thompson <br />Agent <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.