My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE33492
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE33492
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:43:56 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 1:47:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
2/14/1993
Doc Name
Letter
From
MOUNTAIN COAL CO
To
MLR
Violation No.
CV1993006
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• i <br />A COMPARISON OF TRIANGULATION BENCH MARK MONUMENT FIELD AND AERIAL <br />PHOTOGRAMMETRIC SURVEY RESULTS FOLLOWING EACH SEMI-ANNUAL SURVEY. THE <br />RESULTS OF EACH AERIAL PHOTOGRAMMETRIC SURVEY SHALL BE ACCEPTED AS <br />ACCURATE, IN THE EVENT THAT THE AERIAL PHOTOGRAMMETRIC AND MOST RECENT <br />ANNUAL TRIANGULATION MONUMENT FIELD SURVEY RESULTS CORRELATE WITH AN <br />AVERAGE TRIANGULATION MONUMENT LOCATION DEVIATION OF LESS THAN 0.2 FEET <br />VERTICALLY AND HORIZONTALLY, WITH TRIANGULATION MONUMENT LOCATION <br />DEVIATIONS OF LESS THAN 0.4 FEET VERTICALLY AND HORIZONTALLY FOR LESS <br />THAN 83X OF THE TRIANGULATION MONUMENTS, AND WITH NO SINGLE TRIANGULATION <br />POINT LOCATION DEVIATION VERTICALLY OR HORIZONTALLY IN EXCESS OF 0.8 FEET. <br />TUS: Forgiven <br />pulation No. 16 <br />IN THE EVENT THAT THE AERIAL PHOTOGRAMMETRIC MONUMENT SURVEYS FAIL TO <br />MEET THE STIPULATED ACCURACY CRITERIA, MCC SHALL UTILIZE TRADITIONAL <br />FIELD SURVEY TECHNIQUES TO ESTABLISH THE REASONS FOR LACK OF <br />CORRELATION. IF THE RESULTS CANNOT BE CORRELATED, MCC SHALL RESUME <br />TRADITIONAL FIELD SURVEY MONUMENT MONITORING, IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE <br />ACCURACY CRITERIA AND STANDARDS CONTAINED WITH STIPULATION NO. 15. <br />STATUS: Forgiven <br />Stipulation No 17 <br />THE DIVISION DIRECTS MCC TO SUBMIT REPORTS OF ITS SUBSIDENCE MONITORING <br />PROGRAM ON A SEMI-ANNUAL BASIS, COMMENCING ONE MONTH AFTER THE <br />INSTALLATION AND INITIAL SURVEYING OF THE SUBSIDENCE MONUMENTS. FURTHER, <br />DUE TO THE COMPLEXITY OF THE PERMIT AREA, GEOLOGY, PRESENCE OF LANDSLIDES <br />AND STEEP SLOPES, AND SENSITIVE HYDROLOGIC ELEMENTS, MCC IS DIRECTED TO <br />SUBMIT A PROPOSED SUBSIDENCE MONITORING REPORT FORMAT TO THE DIVISION FOR <br />APPROVAL. THIS REPORT FORMAT SHOULD RECOGNIZE THE IMPORTANCE OF <br />CONTINUAL UPDATE OF SUBSIDENCE DATA INTERPRETATION, MONITORING OF GROUND <br />WATER LEVELS AND SPRING FLOWS, MONITORING OF MINE INFLOW, AND SUBSURFACE <br />GROUND CONDITIONS WHICH COULD BE CORRELATED TO SUBSIDENCE PREDICTION. <br />THIS REPORT FORMAT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE DIVISION PRIOR TO THE <br />COMMENCEMENT OF EXTRACTION OF COAL WITHIN THE SUBSIDENCE TEST PANEL <br />DESIGNATED IN APPENDIX A TO MCC'S NOVEMBER 1984 PERMIT REVISION <br />APPLICATION (PANEL 1W-15). <br />In a memo dated March 5, 1990 from Matthew Hayes, it was determined that this <br />stipulation could be terminated as of October 27, 1989, because it was <br />incorporated into the permit on page 3-78A. However, with the reorganization <br />of the permit (TR-59), this stipulation was not included. Therefore, the <br />requirements of this stipulation will remain active until incorporated into <br />the permit application <br />STATUS: Active <br />-6- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.