My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE33362
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE33362
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:43:52 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 1:44:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
11/3/1992
Doc Name
Settlement Agreement
From
DMG
To
WYOMING FUEL CO
Violation No.
CV1992010
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JUSTIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT <br />NOTICE OF VIOLATION C-92-O10 <br />Conference Summary <br />NOV C-92-O10 was issued for "failure to submit to the Division at least semi- <br />annually the results of the subsidence monitoring program." The NOV was <br />issued June 22, 1992 by Joe Dudash of the Division. <br />Rule 2.05.6(6) of the Regulations requires semi-annual submittal of subsidence <br />monitoring data, and the approved permit for Golden Eagle also contained such <br />a commitment. The operator had collected quarterly subsidence data from eight <br />monitoring stations beginning in the third quarter of 1988, but the data had <br />not been submitted to the Division. <br />fact of Violation <br />The operator conceded that, although the monitoring had been done, it had not <br />been submitted to the Division. Mr. Thompson indicated that the previous <br />Environmental Coordinator at Golden Eagle had told him that the Division had <br />waived the data requirement submittal. Although the practice had been <br />occurring since 1988 with the Division's knowledge (based on Joe Dudash's <br />discu r ion with previous reclamation specialist Berhan Keffelew), there is no <br />documentation to indicate any specific waiver or variance from the regulatory <br />and permit requirements. I find that a violation did occur. <br />aroposed Civil Penalty assessment <br />History: 3 0 .00 <br />Seriousness: 500 .00 <br />Fault: 750 .00 <br />Good Faith: 0 .00 <br />Total : ~1 ,? <br />Seriousness <br />This is a violation of administrative requirements, and as such the degree of <br />seriousness is judged based on the degree to which enforcement was <br />obstructed. In this case, it appears that enforcement was obstructed to a low <br />degree, since the Division was able to verify that the data was being <br />collected and the data was reviewed on a quarterly basis during complete <br />inspections. <br />I recommend that the assessment for seriousness be reduced from '3500.00 to <br />3250.00. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.