1990-11-15_REVISION - M1988112 ‎(2)‎

• Permit No: M1988112
• IBM Index Class Name: Revision
• Doc Date: 11/15/1990
• Doc Name: CONTINUATION OF TRANSCRIPT
• Type & Sequence: AM1
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

148
' 1 seen it nor have we had an opportunity to deal with
2
3 any of the issues.
'
We don
t object to the letter that was
4 filed by the Division of Wildlife incorporated into
5 the applicant's review and we have not responded.
6 THE CHAIRMAN: Now, is that one of these
7 letters?
8 MR. MASSEY: Yes. The November 24th
9 letter, without the attachments, we have seen.
l0 The rest we have never seen and never been approved.
11 MR. COHEN: Could I speak in response to
2 th
i
?
1 e object
on
13 THE CHAIRMAN: Sure. Go ahead.
14 MR. COHEN: Well, I think Dean has made
1 15 objections on two grounds. One is that the letter
16 is hearsay and, in fact, it is hearsay. I mean,
' 17 it's an out-of-court statement. It's -- the person
18 from the Division of Wildlife is not here in the
' 19 room.
20 The rules of evidence apply, although
' '
21 they are relaxed, but you can
t admit hearsay. The
' 22 letter is -- I assume that this is outside of. the
23 normal course of procedure. However, I think the
24 court does have a practice of accepting different
25 types of evidence.

AGREN, BLANDO & BILLINGS