My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1990-11-15_REVISION - M1988112 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988112
>
1990-11-15_REVISION - M1988112 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2021 12:52:42 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 1:43:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
11/15/1990
Doc Name
CONTINUATION OF TRANSCRIPT
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />112 <br />, <br />i 1 source of water that it now appears to have is <br /> 2 inadequate. <br /> 3 MR. HESS: Yes. <br /> 4 UNIDENTIFIED PERSON: What's the source <br /> 5 of that admission? <br /> 6 MR. HESS: Well, when I say inadequate, <br />' 7 it's inadequate for long-term operation of the mine. <br /> e Battle Mountain Resources submitted a <br /> 9 proposed order to the court to set the date of the <br /> 1o status -- or the pretrial conference to move things <br /> 11 along as March 15th. And in that order they asked <br /> 12 for a discovery cutoff of March 5, for the very <br /> 13 reason the <br />were o <br />water <br />eratin <br />under a tem <br />orar <br /> p <br />y <br />g <br />p <br />y <br /> 14 supply plan that was inadequate for their long-term <br />' <br /> 15 needs and they wanted to get this matter -- I don <br />t <br /> 16 want to say over with -- but they were trying to <br /> 17 push this matter through. <br /> 18 Fortunately, Neil has a copy of it right <br /> 19 here, because I can't find mine. <br />' 20 t <br />Wh <br />t th <br />-- <br />r <br />d <br />d <br /> a <br />e propose <br />er says <br />o <br />no <br />or <br />' 21 the proposed order, but the motion or the papers in <br /> 22 front of it in support of the order say, is a <br /> 23 temporary substitute plan of supply has been <br /> 24 submitted to the Office of the State Engineer. <br />' 25 However, that plan is extremely conservative and <br /> <br /> AGREN, BLANDO ~ BILLINGS <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.