Laserfiche WebLink
<br />103 <br /> <br /> 1 objected in this case is probably a little unusual, <br /> 2 perhaps not for a large project, but at least for <br /> 3 most ordinary projects. <br /> 4 UNIDENTIFIED PERSON: What's the timing, <br /> 5 in your best estimate, on these water rights through <br /> 6 the water court? What w <br />ld b <br />th <br />ti <br />i <br />? <br /> ou <br />e <br />e <br />m <br />ng <br /> 7 MR. HESS: With respect to 89-CW-5, a <br /> 8 status conference is set for March 15, anri it really <br /> 9 depends on the judge's calendar. I would give it a <br /> 10 a couple of months, not anticipating how much Battle <br /> 11 Mountain Resources has to prepare. Assuming they <br /> 12 have their experts lined up, I would gues_ a couple <br /> 13 of months. <br /> 14 With respect to 89-CW-32, a Status <br /> 15 conference, or pretrial conference, rather, in that <br /> 16 case has been set for March 16. And at that point a <br /> 17 trial will be set. Discovery, which is a .formal <br /> 18 exchange of information, is supposed to terminate <br /> 19 March 5, but the State, as well as a numbez• of <br /> 0 l <br /> 2 peop <br />e I represent and a couple of other cc+nservancy <br /> 21 districts, have asked for an extension of time to <br /> 22 complete discovery until April 30. <br /> 23 In that case, because the trial is <br /> 24 probably going to last a few days, I think it would <br /> 25 be a little bit reckless for me to give any kind of <br />AGREN, BLANDO 6 BILLINGS <br /> <br />