Laserfiche WebLink
i1 <br />I <br /> <br />72 <br /> 1 incorporated into the design in terms of containment <br /> 2 facilities that we developed. <br />' 3 Alternativ <br />l <br />if <br />lki <br />t <br /> e <br />y, <br />one was <br />a <br />ng about <br /> 4 a more conventional CIL ta111ngs product, we may <br /> 5 have looked at extra levels of confidence .in terms <br />' 6 of containment capabilities. There is a play-off <br /> 7 there between a decision Battle Mountain Gold made <br />' 8 to utilize current technology in treating the <br /> 9 tailings as a total stream versus the containment <br />' l0 f <br />ilit <br />a <br />d <br />d <br />i <br /> ac <br />y we <br />ve <br />es <br />. <br />gne <br />' 11 I donut believe there is any -- there <br /> 12 was any horse trading in terms of environmental <br />' 13 benefit versus cost. I think the objective of this <br /> 14 was to produce an environmentally sound disposal <br /> 15 system. <br /> 16 UNIDENTIFIED PERSON: I'm not assuming <br />1 <br /> 17 any horse trading. Just assuming sometimes when you <br /> 18 move things around in terms of tailings and <br /> 19 technique (inaudible) operation, there are in fact <br /> 20 some trade-offs, and I was trying to get a handle on <br /> 21 what those trade-offs might have been, <br />' 22 UNIDENTIFIED PERSON: There are? <br /> 23 MS. BALDRIGE: There are several <br /> 24 trade-offs. The biggest one is this process uses <br /> 25 less cyanide and ends up with a relatively inert <br />AGREN, BLANDO & BILLINGS <br />